787 974 136
Companies in the timber, furniture, paper and packaging sectors that export or plan to export to Western European and North American markets are increasingly hearing one phrase from potential customers: “Without FSC certification, we cannot work with you.” This is not a suggestion or a negotiating point – it is a harsh market reality which, for companies without FSC certification, means the door is closed to the most valuable contracts.
Global retail chains – IKEA, H&M, Carrefour, Tesco and hundreds of others – have a requirement for FSC certification for all suppliers of wood, paper and cardboard products built into their procurement policies. This is not a matter of goodwill on the part of the procurement department, but a formal corporate requirement approved at board level. A company without FSC certification will not pass supplier qualification – regardless of the quality of its products, prices or delivery times.
The situation is similar in public procurement. An increasing number of tenders in Poland and Western Europe include FSC certification as an eligibility criterion – particularly for contracts for office furniture, stationery, packaging and timber products for public institutions. Companies with FSC certification may participate in these tenders – those without certification are eliminated at the formal stage.
Furthermore, the majority of global companies with any connection to the timber or paper industry hold FSC certification; consequently, to maintain the continuity of the supply chain, they are obliged to collaborate with other certified entities and to purchase certified products. This means that the lack of FSC certification excludes a company not only from doing business with retail chains, but also from cooperating with other producers and processors within the supply chain.
FSC certification is not just a ticket to the market – it is also a selling point that enhances the product’s value in the eyes of the buyer. Such customers are often even willing to pay more for products that have been produced in line with the values they hold dear. In the premium segment and for retailers’ own-label brands, FSC-certified products command higher margins than non-certified products – because buyers understand that the certification is backed by an audited, reliable supply chain.
From a negotiation perspective, an FSC-certified company is a partner with proven credibility – which shortens the qualification process, eliminates the need for repeated audits by the other party and builds trust, which translates into long-term commercial relationships. A corporate client who has once qualified a certified supplier has a reason to stay with them – switching to a new supplier involves repeating the entire qualification process.
The costs of implementing and maintaining FSC Chain of Custody certification are relatively low compared with other certification standards – particularly for companies that already have other quality management systems in place. The annual cost of certification for a small or medium-sized company is many times lower than the value of a single contract to which the certificate provides access.
Companies that have gone through the FSC implementation process report a return on investment within one to three years of obtaining certification – through access to new customers, higher margins on certified products and the elimination of the costs associated with multiple qualification audits. For companies planning to expand into export markets, FSC certification is one of the first investments worth making – because without it, discussions with potential Western partners often break down before a contract is signed.
It is also worth keeping an eye on upcoming changes to the FSC system, which may affect the requirements and the way certified organisations operate. You can find more information in the article ‘FSC 2026 – changes to the standards and their significance for businesses’.
DJB DORADZTWO
Marcin Chorąży
