731 901 601
ISO 42001 and the AI Act – how do they differ and how do they complement each other?

ISO 42001 and the AI Act – how do they differ and how do they complement each other?

The development of artificial intelligence in Europe is increasingly based on two pillars: legal regulations and management standards. In practice, this means that organisations implementing AI are increasingly faced with the requirements of both the EU’s AI Act and the ISO/IEC 42001 standard. Although both documents relate to artificial intelligence, their roles are entirely different.

The AI Act and ISO 42001 – two different approaches to AI

The AI Act is an EU legal regulation that sets out obligations relating to the design, deployment and use of AI systems. The provisions focus primarily on safety, the protection of users’ rights and the mitigation of risks arising from the use of artificial intelligence.

ISO 42001, on the other hand, is not a piece of legislation. It is a management standard that helps organisations streamline their AI-related processes and establish a system for overseeing the technology. Its aim is to ensure the responsible management of artificial intelligence throughout the system’s entire life cycle. In practice, the AI Act tells companies ‘what they must comply with’, whilst ISO 42001 helps answer the question ‘how to organise processes to achieve this’.

Key differences between ISO 42001 and the AI Act

AreaISO/IEC 42001AI Act
Nature of the document   International ISO standard   EU Regulation
Legal status   VoluntaryMandatory within the EU
Main objective   AI management system   Regulation of AI use
ScopeManagement of the organisation and AI processes   Requirements for specific AI systems
Certification  Certification possible   No traditional ISO certification
Approach to risk   Continuous risk management   Classification of systems by risk level
Application  All organisations using AI   Entities falling within the scope of the AI Act

Why do organisations link ISO 42001 with the AI Act?

Companies implementing AI are increasingly realising that simply meeting legal requirements may not be enough. The AI Act imposes obligations regarding documentation, oversight, data quality and the monitoring of high-risk systems, but does not describe in detail how to organise the entire AI management framework within a company.

This is precisely where ISO 42001 plays a major role. The standard helps to establish structured processes relating to risk assessment, accountability, audits, supplier oversight and incident management. This makes it easier for an organisation to demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements. For many companies, ISO 42001 is therefore becoming a practical foundation for preparing for the AI Act – particularly where AI influences business decisions, customers or data security.

More and more organisations are using artificial intelligence in their day-to-day business processes. If you want to streamline the way you manage AI and prepare your organisation to meet the requirements of the standard, find out what implementing ISO 42001 involves.

 

Read other posts

The 2022 update to ISO 27001

The 2022 update to ISO 27001

On 23 September 2022, the new ISO 27001:2022 standard was approved. Find out what changes the update to the information security standard has brought! read more
Risk management in organisations – what are the benefits of implementing ISO 31000?

Risk management in organisations – what are the benefits of implementing ISO 31000?

For decades, the development of the global market has necessitated the creation of standards that would allow for the harmonisation of operations between cooperating enterprises. Initially, standardisation bodies focused mainly on the properties of goods placed on the market. read more
New cybersecurity obligations for businesses – what do you need to know?

New cybersecurity obligations for businesses – what do you need to know?

The NIS 2 Directive is not just a set of new legal obligations. Above all, it represents a shift in the way organisations think about cybersecurity. read more
More posts